
Skin cancers
BREAK-3 trial | 2011 | Melanoma - BRAF+ |
BRIM-3 trial | 2011 | Melanoma - BRAF+ |
coBRIM trial | 2014 | Melanoma - BRAF+ |
COMBI-v trial | 2015 | Melanoma - BRAF+ |
COMBI-d trial | 2017 | Melanoma - BRAF+ |
IMspire 150 trial | 2020 | Melanoma - BRAF+ |
HD-IL-2 meta-analysis | 1999 | Melanoma - metastatic |
MDX-020-010 trial | 2010 | Melanoma - metastatic |
SEER-metastasectomy analysis | 2011 | Melanoma - metastatic |
CheckMate 069 trial, ipi/nivo vs ipi | 2015 | Melanoma - metastatic |
CheckMate 037 trial | 2015 | Melanoma - metastatic |
KEYNOTE-029 trial, pembro vs low ipi | 2017 | Melanoma - metastatic |
KEYNOTE-006 trial | 2017 | Melanoma - metastatic |
CheckMate 511 trial | 2019 | Melanoma - metastatic |
CheckMate 067 trial | 2019 | Melanoma - metastatic |
CheckMate 066 trial | 2020 | Melanoma - metastatic |
IMMUNED trial | 2020 | Melanoma - metastatic |
Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma | 2022 | Melanoma - metastatic |
E-1684 trial | 1996 | Melanoma - stage III |
EORTC 18071 trial | 2016 | Melanoma - stage III |
MSLT-II trial | 2017 | Melanoma - stage III |
DeCOG-SLT trial | 2019 | Melanoma - stage III |
KEYNOTE-054 Trial/EORTC-1325 | 2020 | Melanoma - stage III |
COMBI-AD trial | 2020 | Melanoma - stage III |
CheckMate 238 trial | 2020 | Melanoma - stage III |
E1609 trial | 2020 | Melanoma - stage III |
CheckMate 238 trial
Ascierto PA et al, Lancet Oncol, 2020; PMID:32961119
Melanoma - stage III
Background: phase III, RCT included 906 patients with resected stage IIIB-C (Stage IIIA was not included unlike KEYNOTE-054) or stage IV melanoma, with ECOG 0-1. Brain mets, mucosal or acral melanoma were eligible. Main exclusion: Ocular melanoma, autoimmune disease and systemic steroid use.
Arm A: Nivolumab 3mg/kg IV q2wk (n=453)
Arm B: High dose ipi: ipilimumab 10mg/kg IV q3wk x4 then q12wk wk (n=453)
Treatment duration: up to 1yr or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.
Primary end point: RFS
Median Follow up: 51.1mo (4.2yr)
Median RFS: 52.4mo vs 24.1mo; nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively
4-yr RFS: 51.7% vs 41.2%; nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively (HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.60-0.86; P=.0003)
Median distant metastasis-free survival (mDMFS): not reached vs 52.9; nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively
4-yr DMFS: 59.2% vs 53.3%; nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively
4-yr OS: 77.9% vs 76.6%; nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.66-1.14; P=.31)
mOS was not reached in either groups.
Main adverse events. Nivolumab and ipilimumab: any events (4% vs 6%). In nivolumab group of 452 patients 2% had grade 3-4 adverse events: one patient had pneumonitis, one DKA and one diarrhea. In ipilimumab out of 453 patient 2% had grade 3-4 toxicities: colitis (two patients), and diarrhea, rash, elevated lipase, bone marrow failure, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, rash, and adrenocortical insufficiency. Some patients had more than one adverse event
Conclusions: Nivolumab provides significant improvement in PFS in adjuvant settings for resected melanoma patients. Impact on OS has not yet established.
Summarized by Veli Bakalov, MD