top of page

Skin cancers

BREAK-3 trial
2011
Melanoma - BRAF+
BRIM-3 trial
2011
Melanoma - BRAF+
coBRIM trial
2014
Melanoma - BRAF+
COMBI-v trial
2015
Melanoma - BRAF+
COMBI-d trial
2017
Melanoma - BRAF+
IMspire 150 trial
2020
Melanoma - BRAF+
HD-IL-2 meta-analysis
1999
Melanoma - metastatic
MDX-020-010 trial
2010
Melanoma - metastatic
SEER-metastasectomy analysis
2011
Melanoma - metastatic
CheckMate 069 trial, ipi/nivo vs ipi
2015
Melanoma - metastatic
CheckMate 037 trial
2015
Melanoma - metastatic
KEYNOTE-029 trial, pembro vs low ipi
2017
Melanoma - metastatic
KEYNOTE-006 trial
2017
Melanoma - metastatic
CheckMate 511 trial
2019
Melanoma - metastatic
CheckMate 067 trial
2019
Melanoma - metastatic
CheckMate 066 trial
2020
Melanoma - metastatic
IMMUNED trial
2020
Melanoma - metastatic
Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
2022
Melanoma - metastatic
E-1684 trial
1996
Melanoma - stage III
EORTC 18071 trial
2016
Melanoma - stage III
MSLT-II trial
2017
Melanoma - stage III
DeCOG-SLT trial
2019
Melanoma - stage III
KEYNOTE-054 Trial/EORTC-1325
2020
Melanoma - stage III
COMBI-AD trial
2020
Melanoma - stage III
CheckMate 238 trial
2020
Melanoma - stage III
E1609 trial
2020
Melanoma - stage III

CheckMate 238 trial
Ascierto PA et al, Lancet Oncol, 2020; PMID:32961119

Melanoma - stage III

Background: phase III, RCT included 906 patients with resected stage IIIB-C (Stage IIIA was not included unlike KEYNOTE-054) or stage IV melanoma, with ECOG 0-1. Brain mets, mucosal or acral melanoma were eligible. Main exclusion: Ocular melanoma, autoimmune disease and systemic steroid use.

Arm A: Nivolumab 3mg/kg IV q2wk (n=453)
Arm B: High dose ipi: ipilimumab 10mg/kg IV q3wk x4 then q12wk wk (n=453)
Treatment duration: up to 1yr or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

 

Primary end point: RFS
Median Follow up: 51.1mo (4.2yr)

 

Median RFS: 52.4mo vs 24.1mo; nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively
4-yr RFS: 51.7% vs 41.2%; nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively (HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.60-0.86; P=.0003)

 

Median distant metastasis-free survival (mDMFS): not reached vs 52.9; nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively
4-yr DMFS: 59.2% vs 53.3%; nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively
4-yr OS: 77.9% vs 76.6%; nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.66-1.14; P=.31)
mOS was not reached in either groups.

 

Main adverse events. Nivolumab and ipilimumab: any events (4% vs 6%). In nivolumab group of 452 patients 2% had grade 3-4 adverse events: one patient had pneumonitis, one DKA and one diarrhea. In ipilimumab out of 453 patient 2% had grade 3-4 toxicities: colitis (two patients), and diarrhea, rash, elevated lipase, bone marrow failure, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, rash, and adrenocortical insufficiency. Some patients had more than one adverse event

 

Conclusions: Nivolumab provides significant improvement in PFS in adjuvant settings for resected melanoma patients. Impact on OS has not yet established.

 

Summarized by Veli Bakalov, MD

 

Send a feedback

 

Download HemeOncBuddy app!

GooglePlayStore.png
appstorebutton.png
bottom of page