top of page

GU cancers

Neoadjuvant MVAC
2003
Bladder - advanced
BC2001 trial, RT w/wo chemo
2012
Bladder - advanced
Keynote 045
2017
Bladder - advanced
Checkmate 275
2017
Bladder - advanced
Erdafitinib trial
2019
Bladder - advanced
JAVELIN Bladder 100 Trial
2020
Bladder - advanced
Keynote 052
2020
Bladder - advanced
EV 301 trial (Enfortumab Vedotin)
2021
Bladder - advanced
Intermittent Androgen suppression
2012
Prostate - advanced
Hero Trial
2020
Prostate - advanced
ENACT Trial, enza vs active surveillance
2022
Prostate - early stage
Docetaxel and Estramustine vs Mitoxantrone
2004
Prostate - metastatic
Affirm Trial
2012
Prostate - metastatic
Prevail Trial
2014
Prostate - metastatic
CHAARTED trial (docetaxel)
2015
Prostate - metastatic
Latitude Trial
2017
Prostate - metastatic
Titan Trial
2019
Prostate - metastatic
Enzamet Trial
2019
Prostate - metastatic
TheraP Trial
2021
Prostate - metastatic
Vision Trial
2021
Prostate - metastatic
ARASENS trial, Docetaxel+ADT +/- Darolutamide
2022
Prostate - metastatic
Sunitinib versus INF-alfa
2007
RCC - advanced
Temsirolimus vs INF-alfa trial
2007
RCC - advanced
IMDC analysis
2009
RCC - advanced
AXIS trial
2011
RCC - advanced
Axitinib dose titration
2013
RCC - advanced
EXIST-2 trial
2013
RCC - advanced
Lenvatinib trial
2015
RCC - advanced
CheckMate 025 trial
2015
RCC - advanced
Surveillance in m-RCC
2016
RCC - advanced
METEOR trial
2016
RCC - advanced
CABOSUN trial
2017
RCC - advanced
IMmotion151 trial
2019
RCC - advanced
CheckMate 214 trial
2020
RCC - advanced
KEYNOTE-426 trial
2020
RCC - advanced
JAVELIN Renal 101 trial
2020
RCC - advanced
CLEAR trial
2021
RCC - advanced
Checkmate 9ER trial
2021
RCC - advanced
ASSURE trial (ECOG-ACRIN E2805)
2016
RCC - perioperative
S-TRAC trial
2016
RCC - perioperative
PROTECT trial
2017
RCC - perioperative
*KEYNOTE-564 trial
2021
RCC - perioperative
**CheckMate 914 trial
2021
RCC - perioperative

Affirm Trial
Scher HI et al, NEJM, 2012, PMID 22894553

Prostate - metastatic

Background: Phase III, Double blinded, RCT included 1,199 patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer after one or two chemotherapy regimens.

 

Arm A: Enzalutamide 160 mg daily
Arm B: Placebo

 

Primary Endpoint: OS
mFollow up: 14.4 mo

 

OS: 18.4 mo vs 13.6 mo, arm A vs B; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.75; P<.001

Secondary endpoints: PSA-level response rate (54% vs 2%, P<0.001), soft-tissue response rate (29% vs 4%, P<0.001), quality-of-life response (43% vs 18%, P<0.001), the time to PSA progression (8.3mo vs 3.0mo; P<0.001), radiographic PFS (8.3mo vs. 2.9mo; P<0.001)

 

Main Adverse events: Grade 3-4 events (45.3% vs 53.1% arm A vs B). Most common: Fatigue (34% vs 29%), Diarrhea (21% vs 18%), Hot flash (20% vs 10%), musculoskeletal pain (14% vs 10%), seizure (0.6% vs 0%)

 

Conclusions: Enzalutamide improved OS, PSA response rate, quality of life response, time to PSA progression, soft tissue response rate, radiographic PFS, time to first skeletal related event when compared to placebo in men with metastatic, castration resistant prostate cancer.

 

Summarized by Pragnan Kancharla, MD

 

Send a feedback

 

Download HemeOncBuddy app!

GooglePlayStore.png
appstorebutton.png
bottom of page